top of page

Everyone Approved it. Nobody Owned it.

Why governance produces signatures, not ownership. - 5 mins read

Everyone Approved it. Nobody Owned it.

By Stefani Markov

Authors

IMG_20240221_092528bright.jpg

Stefani Markov

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt, PMP, and MOS: Expert(Microsoft)

Founder & CEO

Stefani@metrixltd.com

  • LinkedIn
Photo OM.jpg

Orlin Markov

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt, PMP

Founder & CEO

Orlin@metrixltd.com

+359 876 153 098

  • LinkedIn

4/25/26, 12:00 PM





Most organisations do not have an accountability problem in the way they think they do. They have an overproduction problem. Too many approvals, too many sign-offs, too many layers of documented involvement that create the appearance of control while quietly removing the conditions required for ownership to exist in any meaningful sense.



There is a moment in every governance process that has been collectively accepted as accountability. Someone senior reviews something, asks a few questions, signs, and the system records that ownership has been exercised. From that point onward, the process is considered governed. What actually happens is more subtle. Responsibility is not assigned, it is diluted. The signature becomes a substitute for ownership, and the audit trail becomes evidence of activity rather than evidence of accountability.



This works exceptionally well right up to the point where something goes wrong. At that moment, organisations do not look for the person who owned the outcome. They look for the chain of approvals. The question becomes who signed, who reviewed, who was informed, because those are the only things the process has made visible. Ownership, having never been clearly established, cannot be located after the fact.



The uncomfortable part is that this is not a failure of governance. It is governance functioning exactly as designed. When ownership is spread across multiple approvals, it becomes negotiable. When it is negotiable, it becomes avoidable. And when it becomes avoidable, it disappears precisely when it is needed most.



Real accountability is structurally simple and culturally difficult. It requires one person who both has the authority to influence the outcome and cannot outsource the consequence of it. Everything else is coordination. If a process produces more signatures than decisions, it is not strengthening accountability. It is engineering a way around it.



The carousel breaks down how this shows up structurally, and why the difference between approval and accountability is not semantic, but operational.



#Governance #Accountability #ProcessManagement







Ready? Let's talk.



bottom of page